Most people would solve this problem by putting a spacer underneath the board to stabilize things, but [Felix] decided to go a level deeper and change the mounting system altogether with a simple mod. The boards now lie on a flat metal plate, and his magnetic holders are simple to make and easily do the job of holding any size PCB secure. As a bonus, it turns out that the holders also do a passable job of holding work materials down on a laser cutter’s honeycomb table. A video overview is embedded below, and the design files are available on Thingiverse.

On another note: I only found patents from them for CN, US, and DE. How can this be considered a “global patent”? There doesn’t seem to be one in GB, where Pimoroni is located.

And not all chiplet approaches are alike, as each group has a different twist. Plus, the chiplet market is confusing and it’s unclear if it will ever live up to its promises.

I feel like this is the wrong approach. Back in the 1980s, the easiest way to produce all of the frequencies needed for an organ was to make a top-octave generator and feed each of those 12 signals into a chain of flip flops. But today, microcontrollers cost less than flip flops. The microcontroller approach would be to generate all of the C notes with one uC, all of the C# with another, and so on. But this is overkill, since there are way more outputs on an an ATmega328 than are needed. So each uC can be programmed to generate just three or four classes of notes, so that’s one chip to do C, C#, D, and D#, the next to do E, F, F#, and G, the next to do G#, A, A#, and B. Three chips, and you’ve got enough outputs to handle five octaves of each. Or split the octave four ways, and you can do seven octaves. Because the flip-flops are practically free, computationally.

Thanks, I found some nice ones that would allow me to fill it up once, and then create a custom “pick box” by linking them togetherhttp://kunst.licefa-webshop.de/index.asp?katalog=0000000030&deeplink=1&shop=kunst&katalogname=Leitf26232283Bhig-28SMD29&resetfilter=1&Spalten_Unterkataloge=4&mmauspraeg1=0&mmauspraeg2=0&line=OL

In a statement emailed to The Register, an Intel spokesperson suggested any risk can be mitigated through existing software protections, such as writing code that is resistant to SMT side-channel attacks. Chipzilla is, essentially, taking a line suggested in the mailing list discussion of the flaw that this isn't so much a vulnerability as "a fully expected by-design property" arising from SMT.

I would have thought that something like this would do the trick https://www.idt.com/products/clocks-timing/jitter-attenuators-frequency-translation/8t49n1012-femtoclock-ng-12-output-frequency-synthesizer

Juki was established in 1938, and is headquartered in Japan. It manufactures and sells industrial and household sewing machines and SMT systems. The company has nine manufacturing and six development bases in Japan and global manufacturing and development bases in China and Vietnam.

pseudocode: macro STi0 = 0xnnnn macro STi1 = 0xnnnn … macro STiA = 0xnnnn macro STiB = 0xnnnn uint16 STn[12] = zeroes busout out1[d0-d7] busout out2[d8-dB]

Join the club! Ive been building one for the last 8 hours. The extruder is in reverse, but everything else is in order

It should be a law that everything coems with schematics to save on landfill for those that can be bothered to fix them.

Purchase Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Coatings Market Report @ https://www.absolutereports.com/purchase/13104328